What's She talking about?
ORTHOMOM SAID:
This is just bunk. Anyone saying otherwise is simply either anti-orthodox, a complete idiot, or completely disengenuous. You choose one.
At first glance you would think shes talking about Gush Katif.Right?wrong.
When it comes to Gush Katif she is so left she fell off.
EDITED ON GOOD ADVICE FROM NOT SO KRUM
Mom what gives?
If that doesn't get your panties in a buch read this shit .
-amshinover lives in amshinov plus or minus a week
posted by AMSHINOVER @ 8:29 AM
13 Comments:
At 8/17/2005 8:49 AM,
Unknown said…
I'm not sure what your'e problem is with that post. All it shows is that she's ambivalent. Where do you get "Seems so long as you agree with her you are right in her mind" from that post?
At 8/17/2005 8:52 AM,
AMSHINOVER said…
you see
Anyone saying otherwise is simply either anti-orthodox, a complete idiot
as ambivalent? and if you mean her gk post, read all of them not just the link(er)(yiddish joke;)).
At 8/17/2005 8:58 AM,
Unknown said…
"you see
Anyone saying otherwise is simply either anti-orthodox, a complete idiot
as ambivalent? "
Huh? That line was from a post re Lawrence schools. All of her disengagement posts reflect ambivelance (one is even called "all mixed up"). Machlokes in pshat in Orthomom.
At 8/17/2005 9:08 AM,
AMSHINOVER said…
TOUCH'E
At 8/17/2005 1:01 PM,
DovBear said…
Can someone explain to me in polite words what was so objectional about my post? I am simply pointing out that the armchairs media critics are a bunch of hypocrites. Agree or disagree there's no reason to take it personal.
At 8/17/2005 1:19 PM,
AMSHINOVER said…
1 you pick the wrong day for it.
2 you pickn the wrong paper on the wrong day
3 you mildly compared it to jenin
4 it was like someone giving a speech about the hague at yad veshem on tishabov
At 8/17/2005 5:50 PM,
DovBear said…
Shragie, WHY was it awful?
I was criticizing the media critics. Not Israel. Not settlers. The media critics!
And, it's like Jenin in that soldiers are removing people from their homes against their will. In no other way, but that way.
At 8/17/2005 11:03 PM,
Anonymous said…
Thank you for this excellent blog. Keep it going.
I'm sure you'd be interested in cartoon animals
Much info about cartoon animals
At 8/18/2005 6:54 AM,
Anonymous said…
To all you cowardly anonymouses pushing other websites or products:
Be man or woman enough to state your name. Most of these topics are very serious and steeped with emotion. This is not a forum for you to pop in for a little advertising.
And BTW,
Cartoon animals?!?!? R u kidding me? This is serious stuff and your busy pushing @#%$&^%(sorry Amshi, certain words I just can't bring myself to write) Cartoon animals.
What you do in the privacy of your home with any type of animal is your business. Don't subject the Amshinover to that.
At 8/18/2005 9:38 AM,
DovBear said…
Shragie, I agree with every word you wrote, and can't imagine why you think my post criticizing the people who criticize the Times would suggest otherwise.
I think you have made a mistake.
At 8/18/2005 12:11 PM,
DovBear said…
Oh so you're a rascist. Now I get it. Thanks for explaining.
PS - You don't love Jews more than me. I just hate Arabs less than you do.
At 8/18/2005 7:51 PM,
DovBear said…
If the “Palestinians” and Jews were of similar moral and ethical standings then the functions of the soldiers can also be similar.
Assuming that Arabs are less moral than Jews is rascist. Putting Palestenian in quotes is rascist. The entire premise of your argument is rascism.
At 8/19/2005 11:10 AM,
Anonymous said…
Shragi and dovbear, GET A ROOM.
you guys sound like youve been married for years.
Post a Comment
<< Home